Posts Tagged ‘Michael Moynihan’

Video interview, ‘All the President’s Newsmen,’ Reason Online’s Michael Moynihan on Ben Cardin’s Newspaper Revitalization Act, and why Washington should not bailout newspapers: ‘why should the government support an industry that consumers are rejecting?’

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Reason Online:

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) has introduced the Newspaper Revitalization Act, a bill that would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) warns of the “serious consequences for our democracy” if his hometown paper, The Boston Globe, goes belly up. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has publicly argued for an antitrust exemption to save the San Francisco Chronicle, a paper that has long supported her political career. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.)  recently argued that “If Congress does not act…a major city in the United States will be without a newspaper in the fairly near future.”

Washington can give newspapers tax breaks or generous subsides to keep them afloat. There are many ways of extending the life of a terminally-ill by forcing onto life support. But why should the government support an industry that consumers are rejecting?

“Most of those supporting a newspaper bailout were also critical of the media’s behavior in the run-up to the Iraq War,” says Reason senior editor Michael Moynihan. “Now imagine the reaction if the very same journalists wrote the very same stories about Iraq in 2002 but were reliant upon the Bush administration for their survival.”

 Video:

Michael Moynihan: ‘The United Kingdom’s selective intolerance of free speech’

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Reason:

Last month, the Dutch government commenced legal proceedings against a sitting member of parliament, Geert Wilders, for engaging in “hate speech.”  Wilders’ primary offense was producing the short film Fitna, which juxtaposed sanguinary passages from the Koran with grisly scenes of Islamist violence.

A three-judge panel in Amsterdam ruled that the film-and some of Wilders’ more intemperate public statements, like his comparison of the Koran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf-warranted criminal prosecution, for he was making “one-sided generalizations” about Islam and was, therefore, “insulting Muslim worshippers” in Holland.

If it was Wilders desire to provoke liberal governments into revealing a veiled intolerance of freedom of speech-while mollycoddling religious extremists-his mission has proved a gargantuan success.