‘The World is Flat’ author Thomas Friedman returns $75,000 paid to him by California air quality government body, after NY Times enforces internal policy against some outside speaking fees
Friedman ended up giving the money back to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District because the newspaper’s ethics guidelines prohibit journalists from taking speaking payments from anything other than nonprofits and educational institutions. That means fees from government agencies are verboten.
Friedman wouldn’t talk, so I didn’t get to ask him if he would be willing to disclose the payments from his other appearances. I’m told the “World Is Flat” author gets paid for roughly one speaking engagement a month. If he received his standard $75,000 fee for each, that would be $900,000 in outside income a year.
Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis treated me like the skunk at the garden party when I asked her whether Timespeople like Friedman should tell the public, in detail, about that income.
Shouldn’t readers be informed if, for example, a foundation that supports bullet trains paid a hefty speaking fee to a transportation reporter?
This afternoon the New York Times acknowledged (in a fashion) that it needed to tighten (at least a bit) its internal oversight of outside commitments.
Related Posts:
- Local CA government pays $75,000 to bring in liberal speaker
- No Holds Barred: What’s up with Tom Friedman? - SHMULEY BOTEACH
- Peter Robinson in Forbes: We need to take the advice of Milton Friedman on health care
- 57% say top tax rate should be 25% of income
- Ben Smith: FEC slaps Rev. Al with $285k fine
Tags: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Catherine Mathis, la times, NY Times, Thomas Friedman, world is flat
